FionaK |
|
| http://www.theguardian.com/environment/201...ls-higher-japanThis is not getting any better. A radiation spike with no explanation of its origin. Workers exposed to doses of radiation far in excess of the permissable amount and without equipment to monitor their exposure for themselves. QUOTE The high radiation levels announced on Sunday highlighted the dangers facing thousands of workers as they attempt to contain, treat and store water safely, while preventing fuel assemblies damaged in the accident from going back into meltdown.
Japan's nuclear workers are allowed an annual accumulative radiation exposure of 50 millisieverts.
Tepco said radiation of 230 millisieverts an hour had been measured at another tank – up from 70 millisieverts last month. A third storage tank was emitting 70 millisieverts an hour, Tepco said. Radiation near a pipe connecting two other tanks had been measured at 230 millisieverts.
Tepco admitted recently that only two workers had initially been assigned to check more than 1,000 storage tanks on the site. Neither of the workers carried dosimeters to measure their exposure to radiation, and some inspections had not been properly recorded. There is a tendency to blame Tepco, and that is fair enough. But it seems to me that there is no evidence anyone else would be doing any better. It is at least plausible that we cannot actually deal with this kind of disaster at all. The risk is low: the hazard is high and getting higher. That, for me, has always been the issue
|
| |